ISO 9001 talks about Customer focus
as one of the principles, most important at that, on which a Quality Management
System should be based in an organisation. It is sometimes easier to drive home
principle simply by citing an example to the contrary. I thought following
incident would make a good case study.
Just the other day I went to Bata to
buy a shoe for walking. When the sales person informed me the price is
Rs.500/=for the pair selected, I didn’t pay much attention to what he said and
thought that he is simply rounding off the figure to make it easy to comprehend
the amount correctly. Again when he raised the bill and I paid off using my
credit card I didn’t care to look into the amount I signed for ! But I was
certainly surprised when I came home and noticed that the amount was Rs.500/=
when I had a cursory glance at the charge slip. Curious to know whether Bata
has changed their culture of Rs.xx9/=, I checked the bill only to find indeed
the price is Rs.500/=. However when I opened the bag and found the price tag
carrying a price of Rs.499/=, I started reflecting on how a seemingly innocuous
incident has much greater significance viz. a company’s culture, policy et al.
It is one thing to indicate the price
(orally) as Rs.500/= quite another to actually raise the bill for Rs.500/= when
the official price is Rs.499/=. It is not the question of absolute amount but
the fact that there is an inconsistency between the price tag and billed
amount.
Is it okay if the amount involved is
small but not correct when it is high? It is akin to people saying (I have
heard it many times) “ Chi chi, he is a telling a lie for such a small amount.”
Does it mean one can tell a lie if the amount involved is high? How much amount
is high enough will next pop up! And who draws a line and decides the threshold
limits?
This is where the organisation’s core
values, policies and culture comes in along with the awareness of these on the
part of the employees. It may be easier to define and document the policies
etc. but very difficult to make the employees understand and assimilate the
responsibilities that such policies impose on their day to day transactions and
behavior.
The incident got further uglier with
this particular outlet of Bata saying the company does not accept Amex card.
But just a week before this incident I
purchased a shoe on Amex card at a different outlet of the very same Bata. How
can there be a difference between the outlets? Even if it were to be a
Franchise outlet such inconsistencies should be allowed to be happening.Is Bata
listening?
This is an example of an organization
having no customer focus, not having a consistent/uniform procedure and not
being able to make employees aware of the policies & procedures, if any. It
is okay as long as it is an exception. Otherwise this could impact seriously
business results in the long run.
No comments:
Post a Comment